Peace Without Parity Is Not Peace: Why Feminist Data Governance Defines 21st Century Security

For 25 years we’ve tracked women’s participation in peace processes. For 25 years we’ve measured conflict data. But we’ve never connected these systems to see how exclusion from digital power predicts instability as clearly as exclusion from peace negotiations does. Here’s why that integration matters—and why women must own the tools that build it.

WHY THIS MATTERS:
The UN measures gender equality by counting women in parliaments. The World Bank tracks gaps in legal rights. National statistical offices document violence against women. These metrics matter. But they systematically miss women’s organizing power, the economic value of care work, the resources flowing through women’s networks, and the policy changes won through feminist advocacy. This isn’t an oversight—it’s a choice about what counts. And that choice now shapes the AI systems that will determine labor markets, credit access, healthcare, and democratic participation for generations.

CEDAW General Recommendation 40 established parity as a binding human rights obligation across all spheres of decision-making—political, economic, and digital. The Women, Peace and Security Agenda recognized that sustainable peace depends on women’s participation, protection, prevention, and recovery. Yet despite two decades of these frameworks, peace and parity remain monitored through static reports rather than dynamic evidence. We describe representation but rarely reveal the redistribution of power. We respond to symptoms, not systemic causes. And critically, we’ve ignored how digital exclusion and algorithmic bias translate directly into insecurity.

The fragmentation isn’t due to lack of data—over 70% of relevant indicators already exist in open repositories. What’s missing is the system intelligence to connect them: to see how parity, peace, and digital power interact as one dynamic ecosystem. Countries with high political parity but low digital parity face new forms of power displacement—women gain representation in traditional institutions while the actual locus of decision-making shifts to digital platforms and algorithmic systems where they remain systematically excluded. When women lack decision-making power in AI development, those systems perpetuate bias; biased systems justify continued exclusion; exclusion destabilizes communities; instability becomes the excuse to further centralize power away from women.

This is why we’re proposing Parity and Peace Intelligence for an International WPS Network: a federated, feminist data infrastructure that connects existing peace, parity, and digital governance data into one living accountability system. Not to produce more reports, but to reveal the hidden architecture of inclusion and exclusion that determines whether peace can actually take root. Because the question isn’t whether AI will shape the 21st century—it’s whether it will serve democracy or just markets, justice or just efficiency. Feminists who ignore this do so at our peril and will cede power for another century.